Skip to main content

on loss


Why do some losses drive us into despair, while others we face with equanimity?  I believe the answer is unrelated to the “depth of love” (a meaningless expression), but rather to how integral the person was to the fabric of our life.  I remember the passing of each of my parents.  I’d lived away from them for many years and so my everyday existence was unaffected.  I quickly returned to my life, sad but composed. 

Imagine the essence of your life as a large piece of fabric and that of those you care about a different piece.  In most relationships, like mine with my parents, the fabrics are intertwined but yet still distinct.  Intermingled but fully separate.  And so, despite the loss, your own fabric is unharmed.  You still are very much who you were and your life as it was. 

But now imagine a different relationship where the fabrics, rather than being intertwined, have become joined together in places – a parent and child, lovers, or very closest friends.  No longer is there a clearly, distinct you from them.  A meaningful part of your existence and theirs is shared between you.  This person is not only important to you.  They are important FOR you. 

It is these losses, I believe, that hit us hardest.  Where the two lives were joined, a hole now exists.  And while time will allow the hole, like a wound, to close and heal, the process is painful.  And the surrounding fabric, stretched, is sometimes never quite the same.  And then most sadly, some holes are too large to close and the survivor’s life is never restored.  

Popular posts from this blog

on art

"If I were to paint a wild horse, you may not see the horse...but you will surely see the wildness!" -- Picasso Great art isn't about craftsmanship. Its certainly not about realism. The  value of art lay in its ability to transcend rhetoric.  T he ability of the artist to distill a concept, for example "wildness", down to its very essence and to then communicate this to the audience in a way that touches the soul.

the god I was taught to believe in

The god I was taught to believe in had a lot of rules.   Of course, he didn’t expect you to be able to follow them. But he did expect you to try really, really hard.   And if you didn’t try really hard then you must not believe in him enough.   And that was bad news for you.   Because if you couldn’t believe enough then you would have to go to hell, forever.   So, while you didn’t have to worry about possibly failing at keeping the rules, you had to worry double about why you weren’t able to keep the rules.   Man, it was hard. The god I was taught to believe in particularly didn’t like social change.   He didn’t like uppity blacks, he didn’t like (the people on) welfare, he didn’t like feminists.   But he did like patriotism.   I’m not sure if he liked patriotism in people in other countries, but he liked it in Americans.   He also seemed to like Israel, but jews not so much.   He liked country music, but not pop music.   I guess because you can't dance well to c